Again, LOU, you like most believers, mistake the difference between moral laws and the legal system. MOST of what you are against, Morally, isn’t against the laws of the land. Atheists do not seek chaos, in fact most of us are pretty intelligent and scientific, and see the benefits in keeping chaos out of the equation of life. Wrong again, my friend.

So you would be Ok with EVERYONE using their own determination for morals? So if someone believes homosexuals are evil and immoral that would be OK then? Maybe that is THEIR common sense?

Your system is flawed and badly”

Understand there is a BIG difference between MORAL and Laws. EVERYONE uses his or her own determination for morals, because morals can not be legislated. Morally, you are fine to think that homosexuals are immoral, that is a belief system, NOT a legal system.. So it’s fine if you want to think homosexuals are immoral, but is is fine too for homosexuals to think that you are an idiot and a fool. It’s called an opinion, and as long as you do not impede on another’s RIGHTS, you can have whatever morals YOU want. God did not give you those morals, more than likely you got them from your parents or your pastor. IF you want to call it common sense, then that’s your right.

MY system is actually far less flawed than yours is. In my system, I make moral decisions based on what I see as right and wrong, what makes sense. YOU on the other hand make your MORAL decisions based on a belief system that comes from ancient times, and hasn’t been updated in 2000+ years ago. Not that is PROGRESS..NOT!

REALLY? There is design in creation? Where, name me one thing that shows design, beyond natural selection. Remember, natural selection is a four billion year process, potentially, so miniscule changes each thousand years, is possible.

I await your answer… one example is all I ask.

You should read O’s link. Actually, for once it is quite good. It just goes to show how illogical the atheist beliefs really are. When an individual can see the obvious design in creation and still deny the creator it is fascinating. It keeps the whole cluelessness, self-deception and denial paradigm in tact as found in the NY Times Op-ed.

To go with creation/creator you can add law/law-giver.

Is god your ultimate „law giver“?
Is it perhaps the biblical god (or Zeus or Allah?)?
Is the Bible his „law“?
Do we have to follow the Biblical laws not to get “mass chaos”?

In that case we have to kill each woman we find non-virgin in the first night of marriage, by stoning her on her father’s treshold.
In that case we have to stone each person working on holyday.
We have to kill desobediant children.
We are free to SELL our daughters to strangers, to overcome financial crisis.
Etc, etc…

WHAT is the difference between biblical laws and sharia laws?
Why don’t you tell us, instead of writing empty unargumented claims?

WHICH law? Elighten us!

1. I did not say it.
2. What is the difference between sharia and biblical laws?