<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bertrand Russell on God</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1172</link>
	<description>Exploring God and religion in our world today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:52:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breckmin</title>
		<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1172&#038;cpage=1#comment-19953</link>
		<dc:creator>Breckmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1172#comment-19953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is truly amazing is the continual ignoring of evidence.  Information needs a Source, complex mechanical working systems don&#039;t form without intelligence, and even IF-THEN programming of the Lac operon/two part control mechanism of gene regulation in E. Coli all demonstrate theistic implication when you
don&#039;t have a limited definition for science which stuck in the philosophy of naturalism.  Clearly, the evidence for the Infinite Creator being the God of Abraham is based on other evidence once you observe that there IS &quot;a&quot; Creator based on scientific observation and deduction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is truly amazing is the continual ignoring of evidence.  Information needs a Source, complex mechanical working systems don&#8217;t form without intelligence, and even IF-THEN programming of the Lac operon/two part control mechanism of gene regulation in E. Coli all demonstrate theistic implication when you<br />
don&#8217;t have a limited definition for science which stuck in the philosophy of naturalism.  Clearly, the evidence for the Infinite Creator being the God of Abraham is based on other evidence once you observe that there IS &#8220;a&#8221; Creator based on scientific observation and deduction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1172&#038;cpage=1#comment-19938</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whywontgodhealamputees.com/blog/?p=1172#comment-19938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
